Rapid Revision · Logical Reasoning

Syllogisms

Given statements like 'All A are B', decide which conclusions MUST follow. Venn diagrams turn word logic into shapes you can read straight off.

The 3-minute recap

If you read nothing else tonight, read these 5 lines.

  • Always draw Venn diagrams; never reason syllogisms in your head.
  • A conclusion is valid only if it holds in EVERY possible diagram, not just one.
  • 'All A are B' -> circle A inside circle B. 'Some A are B' -> the circles overlap.
  • 'No A are B' -> circles are separate. 'Some A are not B' -> part of A sits outside B.
  • Check 'either-or' pairs when two complementary conclusions each fail on their own.

Formula sheet

Every formula for syllogisms in one place, each labelled so you know exactly when to reach for it. Screenshot it the night before.

All A are B

A fully inside B => 'some B are A' holds, but NOT 'all B are A'

Some A are B

A and B overlap => symmetric, so 'some B are A' also holds

No A are B

A and B disjoint => symmetric, so 'no B are A' also holds

Validity rule

a conclusion follows only if it is true in EVERY valid diagram

Work through the cards

6 cards, each one idea: what it is, a worked example, and the trap to dodge.

Translate to circles

Each statement is a relationship between two circles. Draw the guaranteed case first, then ask whether any other arrangement is also allowed.

'All pens are books; all books are red' => pens inside books inside red => 'all pens are red' follows.

Possibility vs certainty

The exam asks what MUST be true. If you can draw even one valid diagram where a conclusion fails, that conclusion does not follow.

Trap: 'Some A are B' does NOT give 'some A are not B'. The overlap could be total.

The 'some' and 'all' conversions

'Some A are B' is symmetric, so 'some B are A' also holds. 'All A are B' gives 'some B are A' but never 'all B are A'.

All cats are animals => some animals are cats (true); all animals are cats (false).

Handling 'No'

'No A are B' means the circles are disjoint, and it is symmetric: 'no B are A' also holds. Combine it carefully with 'all' and 'some'.

No A are B; all C are A => no C are B follows.

Either-or conclusions

When two conclusions look contradictory, neither is individually certain, but together they cover all cases, the answer is 'either I or II follows'.

'Some A are B' and 'no A are B' as a pair exhaust every possibility.

Trap: Either-or applies only when the two conclusions are complementary AND jointly exhaustive.

Three-statement chains

For three statements, draw one combined diagram satisfying all three, then test each conclusion against it and any alternative you can construct.

Go deeper

A recap is not practice. These are the creators we rate for real depth on syllogisms; full credit to each.

One topic down. Keep the streak going.

Each recap takes 3 minutes; the full set covers everything the first round tests. And when the test is cleared, your resume takes the next screen.

Original content by OptiResume; facts and formulas are common knowledge, the wording is ours. Go-deeper links go to creators we rate; we are not affiliated with them.